Scanlon
Scanlon v. Curtis International, Ltd.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ROMAN SCANLON, on behalf of himself, the No. 1:19-cv-00937-NONE-SKO general public, and those similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING TECHNICOLOR
12 Plaintiff, SA’S MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. (Doc. No. 18) 14 CURTIS INTERNATIONAL LTD., and TECHNICOLOR SA,
16 Defendants. 17 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Roman Scanlon initiated this action by filing a class action complaint on May 3, 2019 against defendants Curtis International Ltd. and Technicolor SA (collectively, “defendants”) in the Merced County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 1-4.) Therein, based upon his allegation that defendants misrepresented to him and others similarly situated that they were purchasing digital home theater projectors with specific brightness ratings, he asserted causes of action for: 1) fraud, deceit, and/or misrepresentation; 2) breach of contract1; 3) violation of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act, California Civil Code § 1750, et seq.; 4) violation of California’s False Advertising Law, California 26 27 The…