Lynn

(PS) Crago v. Lynn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20202:19-cv-02509California2,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY J. CRAGO, No. 2:19-cv-02509 MCE AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS LYNN, CARD, KNACKE., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se and in forma pauperis, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants Lynn, Card, and Knacke, all Sacramento County Sherriff’s Officers, have filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has opposed the motion, ECF No. 18, and defendants have replied, ECF No. 19. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends the motion be GRANTED and that this case be DISMISSED in its entirety for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. I. BACKGROUND A. The Second Amended Complaint Plaintiff, proceeding in pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint against Internal Affairs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.