Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO AMEND, WITH
vs. PREJUDICE (ECF Nos. 57, 58.) BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,
Defendants. 16 17 18 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 58.) On May 29, 2020, defendant Betz filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF…