Eldridge

(PC) Uhuru v. Eldridge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20202:19-cv-01119California2,030 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, No. 2:19-cv-1119 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

LAURA ELDRIDGE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is before the court. Plaintiff again alleges myriad claims against 27 different defendants, including First Amendment retaliation and Free Exercise claims. In his separate handwritten pleading, plaintiff recites 12 claims: exercise of religion, retaliation, medical care/mental health services; ADA and RLUIPA violations; cruel and unusual punishment/excessive force by an officer; threat to safety; property; sexual assault with due process violation; equal protection violations with denials of access to the court; unconstitutional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.