Maria Nino v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20201:20-cv-00306California518 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARIA NINO, CASE NO. 1:20-CV-306 AWI SKO

Plaintiff ORDER CLOSING CASE IN LIGHT OF

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

v. ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

PENDING MOTIONS

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al.,

Defendants (Doc. Nos. 6, 8, 18)

14 On June 10 2020, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this case without prejudice. See 15 Doc. No. 18. The stipulation is signed by the parties and also provides that Plaintiff is to expunge 16 within fifteen days of this order the lis pendens that was filed in connection with this action. See 17 id. The Court views the stipulation as a Rule 41(a)(1) stipulation. 18 Rule 41(a)(1), in relevant part, reads: 19 (A) . . . the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a 20 notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. . . . (B) Unless the notice or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.