(SS) Badillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20201:20-cv-00393California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CECILIO BADILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00393-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY AND THIS ACTION SHOULD

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

PAY FILING FEE

Defendant. (ECF No. 7)

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

18 On March 16, 2020, Cecilio Badillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking 19 review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. 20 (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) On March 24, 22 2020, the Court reviewed Plaintiff’s application and found that it did not provide sufficient 23 information for the Court to determine if he was entitled to proceed in this action without 24 prepayment of fees and he was ordered to file a long form application to proceed without 25 prepayment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.