Price Simms Holdings LLC v. Candle3, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRICE SIMMS HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., No. 2:18-cv-1851-WBS-KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC
CONFERENCE
v. (ECF Nos. 109-115.) CANDLE3, LLC., et al., Defendants.
On December 13, 2019, plaintiffs/counter-defendants PriceSimms Holdings, et al., filed a motion to compel discovery responses from defendant/counter-claimant Candle3, and set it for a January 16, 2020 hearing before the undersigned. (ECF No. 97.) Therein, PriceSimms contended Candle3 had not responded to a number of discovery requests. (Id.) However, a few weeks prior, Counsel for Candle3 moved to withdraw, and so the undersigned concluded that resolution of the motion should be delayed until after Candle3’s representation was sorted. (ECF No. 103.) In February of 2020, the district judge permitted Candle3’s counsel to withdraw on the understanding that Attorney Erin Jensen would be filing a pro hac vice application and substituting his appearance. (ECF Nos. 107, 109.) …