Cargill

(PC) Mosley v. Cargill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20202:19-cv-00393California1,295 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELAN J. MOSLEY, No. 2:19-cv-00393-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER STEVE CARGILL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is now before the court for screening. I. Screening Requirement As plaintiff was previously informed, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.