Tate

(PC) Womack v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20201:19-cv-00614California1,401 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JAMES WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

TATE, et al., (ECF No. 9) Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 I. Introduction Plaintiff Rodney James Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 20, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 8.) In the findings and recommendations, the Court noted that despite his allegations that he suffered excruciating pain when walking on the uneven terrain at his institution, due to lack of pain medication, a mobility vest, or receiving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.