Doe

Doe v. Kane

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 12, 20201:19-cv-00467California3,012 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00467-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,

FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND

THOMAS R. KANE, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 21, 23, 29, 33) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 13 I. Background On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff John Doe (“Plaintiff”), proceeding through counsel, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) against Defendants Thomas R. Kane, Andre Matevousian, Devin Blocher, Boudreau, Deborah G. Schult, and Mary Mitchell (“Defendants”). (Doc. No. 1.) Summonses and civil new case documents were issued on April 12, 2019, and the Court set an Initial Scheduling Conference for July 11, 2019, before the undersigned. (Doc. Nos. 3, 4.) On July 3, 2019,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.