Doe
Doe v. Kane
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOHN DOE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00467-DAD-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REGARDING DISMISSAL WITHOUT
v. PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SERVE,
FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER, AND
THOMAS R. KANE, et al., FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 21, 23, 29, 33) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 13 I. Background On April 10, 2019, Plaintiff John Doe (“Plaintiff”), proceeding through counsel, initiated this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) against Defendants Thomas R. Kane, Andre Matevousian, Devin Blocher, Boudreau, Deborah G. Schult, and Mary Mitchell (“Defendants”). (Doc. No. 1.) Summonses and civil new case documents were issued on April 12, 2019, and the Court set an Initial Scheduling Conference for July 11, 2019, before the undersigned. (Doc. Nos. 3, 4.) On July 3, 2019,…