CCWF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ENID MARIE FLORES, Case No. 1:19-cv-01681-AWI-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED AS

v. FRIVOLOUS BECAUSE IT IS DUPLICATIVE OF CASE 1:19-cv-01509- CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL NONE-JLT WOMEN’S FACILITY, et al., OBJECTIONS DUE IN FOURTEEN DAYS Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Enid Marie Flores is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action. 18 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on November 12, 2019. ECF No. 1. On 19 April 6, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why this case was not duplicative of Flores v. 20 Cal. Corr. Women’s Facility, No. 1:19-cv-01509. In response and in other filings, plaintiff has 21 not disputed that the cases are duplicative. See ECF Nos. 18, 19, 20, 21. 22 Duplicative lawsuits filed by a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis are subject to 23 dismissal as either frivolous or malicious under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). See, e.g., Cato v.…