Thompson
(HC) Brim v. Thompson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KEITH BRIM, No. 2:19-cv-2284 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER P. THOMPSON, WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se. On June 5, 2020, petitioner filed a motion to compel his institution to allow petitioner more time in the law library. Petitioner claims that he is only allowed to use the law library two to three hours every two to three weeks. Moreover, he claims that only three inmates use the law library, so he should be allowed more law library access.1 On February 14, 2020, respondent filed an eight-page motion to dismiss that challenges the petition on jurisdictional grounds, as well as the substance of petitioner’s due process challenges under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). Petitioner has been granted two extensions of time to oppose the motion; the first, for thirty days, and the second, for sixty days,