Montejo
(PC) Stephen v. Montejo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMIE STEPHEN, No. 2:18-cv-01796 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS E. MONTEJO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”) with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Before the court is defendant’s motion to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status. For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend defendant’s motion be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his original complaint here on June 22, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) On screening, this court found plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims for relief and gave plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) In considering plaintiff’s motion to proceed IFP, this court found plaintiff had accrued over three…