Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20201:16-cv-01066California781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-cv-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

vs. (ECF Nos. 60.)

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,

Defendants.

16 17 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a former federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian, Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betz (collectively, “Defendants”), for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On May 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the court’s April 27, 2020 order. (ECF No. 61.) On May 29, 2020, defendant Dr. David Betz filed an opposition to 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.