Restivo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DEVONTE B. HARRIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00797-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v. DISMISSED AS BARRED BY THE STATUTE

OF LIMITATIONS

A. RESTIVO, et al., (ECF NO. 1) Defendants.

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 Devonte Harris (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on June 8, 2020. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff alleges that he submitted his complaint to be filed on May 25, 2020. (Id. at 25). The incidents alleged in the complaint occurred in 2013. Thus, based on the face of the complaint, it appears that Plaintiff most, if not all, of Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, the Court will order Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as barred by the statute of limitations. I. APPLICABLE LAW 26…