Biter

(PC) King v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20201:15-cv-00414California1,823 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LARRY DONNELL KING, SR., No. 1:15-cv-00414-NONE-SAB(PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S MARCH

v. 26, 2020 ORDER

M.D. BITER, et al., (Doc. No. 107)

Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Larry Donnell King, Sr. is appearing in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s March 26, 2020 order denying his request to extend the discovery deadline, filed April 9, 2020. (Doc. No. 107.) Defendants filed an opposition on April 16, 2020, and plaintiff did not file a reply. (Doc. No. 108.) LEGAL STANDARD A district court may refer non-dispositive issues to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); Local Rule 302(c); Mitchell v. Valenzuela,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.