Mastronardi International Limited v. SunSelect Produce (California), Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20201:18-cv-00737California425 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MASTRONARDI INTERNATIONAL CASE NO. 1:18-CV-00737-AWI-JLT

LIMITED,

ORDER AFTER TELEPHONIC Plaintiff, CONFERENCE; ORDER CONSOLIDATING THE ACTIONS v.

SUNSELECT PRODUCE (CALIFORNIA),

INC.,

Defendant.

SUNSELECT PRODUCE, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-00735 DAD JLT

Plaintiff,

v.

MASTRONARDI INTERNATIONAL

LIMITED,

22 Defendant.

24 The Court held an informal, telephonic conference (Doc. 68.) At the conference, counsel 25 agreed that the cases are not in a settlement posture but would be more likely to settle after a 26 determination as to the significance of the foreign arbitration award. They agreed also that the 27 cases should be consolidated for all purposes. The Court may consolidate actions involving a common question of law or fact, and consolidation is proper when it serves the purposes of judicial economy and convenience. Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a). The Ninth Circuit explained that the Court “has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.