(HC) Wandick v. Central California Women's Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20201:20-cv-00745California1,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRYSTAL WANDICK, Case No. 1:20-cv-00745-JDP Petitioner, ORDER DISCHARGING JUNE 3, 2020

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. ECF No. 4 CENTRAL CALIFORNIA WOMEN’S

FACILITY, ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S

UNEXHAUSTED CLAIMS Respondent. ECF No.

ORDER TO STAY AND HOLD IN

ABEYANCE PETITION

18 ECF No. 6 19 Petitioner Krystal Wandick, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. On June 3, 2020, we ordered petitioner to show cause why her petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust her claims in the state courts. ECF No. 4. In our order, we directed petitioner to either move for a stay and abeyance of her petition under the Rhines procedure, notify the court of her intention to proceed with a stay and abeyance under the Kelly procedure and to dismiss her unexhausted claims, or to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.