Unknown

(HC) Turner v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20202:20-cv-00201California689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:20-cv-0201 CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner seeks to challenge the judgment in Sacramento County Case No. 94F04029. (ECF No. 1 at 11, 18, 22.) The petition indicates that petitioner was charged with burglary and found not guilty by reason of insanity in 1995. (Id. at 22.) Petitioner states that he received a twelve-year sentence and has been released. (Id.) Rule 4 of the Habeas Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases requires the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.