McCabe

(PC) Collins v. McCabe

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20201:19-cv-00458California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 LARNELL C. COLLINS, 1:19-cv-00458-AWI-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION v. PROCEED ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS McCABE AND BEREGOUSKAYA FOR CONALL McCABE, et al., INADEQUATE MEDICAL CARE UNDER THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND THAT Defendants. ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

18 Larnell C. Collins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 9, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) The Complaint names as defendants Dr. Conall McCabe, Dr. Jeffery Wang, and Dr. O. Beregouskaya, and brings medical claims under the Eighth Amendment, claims for violation of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, and claims for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.