Folks

(PC) Garcia v. Folks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20202:14-cv-02378California385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL GARCIA, No. 2:14-cv-2378 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F. FOLKS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested appointment of counsel. Plaintiff argues that the limitations on prisoners’ access to the law library due to the COVID-19 pandemic have made preparing for trial extremely difficult. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.