(PS) Meyers v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 15, 20202:16-cv-01121California2,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLEN MEYERS, No. 2:16-CV-01121-MCE-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al, Defendants. 16 Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition in accordance with Local Rule 230(c). The court twice extended plaintiff’s deadline to respond to defendants’ motion. (ECF Nos. 49, 52.) To date, no opposition or statement of non-opposition has been filed. Upon considering the motion and supporting documents, the court finds as follows: I. BACKGROUND This civil rights case arises from allegations that plaintiff received improper medical treatment while incarcerated at Sacramento County jail. Plaintiff was brought to the Sacramento County Jail on September 18, 2013. (ECF No. 42-2 ¶ 10.) At that time, he had previously been diagnosed with an endocrine system disorder, diabetes,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.