Cooper

(PC) McClintock v. Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20202:18-cv-00560California7,176 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN McCLINTOCK, No. 2: 18-cv-0560 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER T. COOPER, et al., Defendants. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel filed March 6, 2020. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff argues that defendants should be required to provide additional documents in response to his first request for production of documents. For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to compel is denied except for request number 32. II. Plaintiff’s Claims To put the motion to compel in context, the undersigned herein sets forth the claims on which this action proceeds. This action proceeds on the second amended complaint as to the following claims of retaliation against defendants Allen, Armenta, J. Cantu, L. Cantu, Cooper, Walker, Wheeler and Winkler.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.