(SS) Thor v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20201:19-cv-00503California454 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CHA XHONG THOR, No. 1:19-cv-00503-GSA

10 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY v. JUDGMENT SHOULD NOT BE

ENTERED FOR PLAINTIFF AND

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social THE CASE REMANDED FOR Security, FURTHER PROCEEDINGS 14 Defendant. 15 Doc. 23

17 The certified administrative record in the above-captioned case omits evidence and 18 documents necessary for the Court to conclude that Plaintiff’s 2015 application for benefits was considered in compliance with applicable law, as well that Plaintiff was provided due process of law. As a result, the Court is unable to determine whether Defendant’s denial of Plaintiff’s 2015 22 application for supplemental security income complied with applicable law. 23 On May 11, 2020, the Court issued an Order Directing Defendant to Provide Additional 24 Procedural Information and to Supplement the Certified Administrative Record as Required. 25 Doc. 23. The order required Defendant to respond within thirty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.