Huh

Huh v. Mono County Office of Education

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20202:19-cv-00170California496 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER HUH, No. 2:19-cv-00170-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER MONO COUNTY OFFICE OF (ECF No. 59) EDUCATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Presently before the court is an informal discovery dispute concerning plaintiff’s request for test questions and book materials that defendants’ expert plans on using during plaintiff’s Rule 35 mental examination. (ECF No. 59.) At the informal hearing Catherine J. Roland appeared for plaintiff; Anthony N. DeMaria appeared for defendants. The parties have agreed to the mental examination, and its general parameters, but disagree as to whether plaintiff is entitled to these materials. Defendants’ position is that providing plaintiff with these materials would violate copyright and trademark laws. (Id. at 2.) Defendants cite to the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association, which instructs psychologists to maintain the “integrity and security of test materials.” (Id.) As a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.