Herrera

(PC) Ennis v. Herrera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20202:18-cv-00816California1,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH L. ENNIS, No. 2:18-CV-0816-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. HERRERA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court are: (1) plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint (ECF No. 26); (2) plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery (ECF No. 29); (3) plaintiff’s motion to stay the case (ECF No. 32); and (4) defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order (ECF No. 33). A. Motion to Amend Complaint This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original civil rights complaint, ECF No. 1. Plaintiff seeks leave to amend because defendants’ response categorized the complaint as “vague.” ECF No. 26, pg. 1. As defendants correctly point out, this is not an adequate justification for granting plaintiff leave to amend. / / / / / / The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.