Carrillo
(PC) Zaragoza v. Carrillo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAUL ZARAGOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01752-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED UNDER
v. THE FAVORABLE-TERMINATION RULE D. CARRILLO, et al. OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Paul Zaragoza is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action. Plaintiff’s complaint argues that prison officials filed a false rules-violation report against him, leading to a loss of good-time credits. ECF No. 1 at 3. He requests money damages. Id. at 6. On April 3, 2020, the court ordered that plaintiff show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed as barred by the favorable-termination rule. ECF No. 11. On May 20, plaintiff responded. ECF No. 12. Because the response fails to show why the favorable-termination rule does not apply, we recommend that the case be dismissed. Again, plaintiff may wish to file an action in state…