Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. v. Virk Systems, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT No. 2:20-cv-0143 TLN DB FINANCE, INC., a Minnesota corporation, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. VIRK SYSTEMS, INC. a California corporation; LAKHWIMDER SINGHVIRK, an individual,

Defendants. 18 On April 17, 2020, plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff’s motion is noticed for hearing before the undersigned on June 21, 2020, pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff’s motion, however, is only accompanied by a declaration in support executed by plaintiff’s Vice President, (ECF No. 9-1), and a brief declaration from plaintiff’s counsel offered in support of a request for attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 9-2.) There is no memorandum in support discussing Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the relevant factors that must be considered upon motion for default judgment identified in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). //// //// wOASe 2 EU VV ETO…