Enjalran

(PS) Nelson Rogers v. Enjalran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 16, 20202:19-cv-01564California583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY A. NELSON ROGERS, No. 2:19-cv-01564-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. PAUL J. ENJALRAN et al., Defendants. 16 Mary A. Nelson Rogers (“Plaintiff”), and individual proceeding pro se, brings this civil complaint pursuant to: 26 U.S.C. § 7433; 12 U.S.C. §§ 3401–04; 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692d–f; 18 U.S.C. § 1702; 26 U.S.C. §§ 6103, 7431; 28 U.S.C. § 1346; and 31 U.S.C. § 1304. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 43.) No objections were filed. /// /// /// Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.