Gilliam
Gilliam v. O'Neill
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20201:19-cv-01711California1,559 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM JESSE GILLIAM, Case No. 1:19-cv-01711-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO ISSUE CORRECTED
v. SUMMONS FOR DEFENDANTS
BARBARA HOPE O’NEILL, HENRY R.
BARBARA HOPE O’NEILL, et al., PEREA, DEPORAH POOCHIGIAN, AND
KEN TANIGUCHI AND REQUIRING
Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO EFFECT SERVICE OF
SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
(ECF No. 3)
18 William Jesse Gilliam (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Barbara Hope O’Neill, the County of Fresno, Phil Larson, Susan B. Anderson, Henry R. Perea, Judy Case McNairy, Deporah Poochigian, Andreas Boregas, Buddy Mendez, Brian Pacheco, Ken Taniguchi, and Elizabeth Diaz (“Defendants”) based on delays in bringing him to trial on allegations that he was a sexually violent predator. On December 11, 2019, the summonses issued in this matter.…