Santillan

(PC) Stanford v. Santillan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20201:19-cv-01634California411 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL STANFORD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01634-JDP

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

L. SANTILLAN, et al.,

STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

Defendants. COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

FORTY-FIVE DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff Michael Stanford is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on March 30, 2020, and plaintiff was ordered to file a first amended complaint within sixty days. See ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has not yet done so. To manage our docket effectively, we impose deadlines and require litigants to meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.