Delaney
(PC) Magee v. Delaney
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE No. 2:19-cv-1634 JAM DB P
PREFILING ORDER,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 14 CAROLYN K. DELANEY, et al., 15 Defendants.
17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has lodged1 this civil rights action seeking 18 relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1). The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 22, 2020, plaintiff filed a “motion to stay pending litigations against double 21 jeopardy.” (ECF No. 3). As a vexatious litigant, plaintiff has yet to be granted permission to file 22 //// 23 24 Plaintiff has been deemed a vexatious litigant. As a result, pleadings brought by plaintiff are 25 not to be filed. Instead, they are simply to be lodged in order to verify the existence of any prerequisite certification. See generally Franklin v. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1232 (9th Cir. 26 1984), abrogated on other grounds by Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989). Thereafter, presuming in…