McLeod

(PS) Shook v. McLeod

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 17, 20202:20-cv-01146California2,059 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFORY LYNN SHOOK, No. 2:20-cv-01146 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER SAM McLEOD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who began this case as a state prisoner proceeding pro se but has since been released from custody, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. II. Statutory Screening of IFP Complaints The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.