Dike

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SCOTT KINDRED, Case No. 1:19-cv-00955-AWI-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY

v. SUBPOENA

B. PRICE, et al., (Doc. 18) Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION On April 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document titled, “Reply to Notice of Issuance of Subpoena to UCR Health.” (Doc. 18.) The Court construed the document as a motion to modify a subpoena pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(d)(3), and it ordered Plaintiff to submit a copy of the subject subpoena to the Court. (Doc. 19.) Plaintiff submitted a copy on May 13, 2020. (Doc. 22.) Per the Court’s order, Defendant filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion on May 19, 2020. (Docs. 25-26.) Plaintiff has not filed a reply, and the time to do so has passed. (See Doc. 19 at 2.) The Court deems the motion submitted. II. LEGAL STANDARDS Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(1)(C), a party may subpoena a…