Walker

Walker v. Police Chief

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20201:19-cv-01546California907 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 HAROLD WALKER, Case No. 1:19-cv-01546-NONE-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY v. WITH THE COURT'S ORDER AND FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM POLICE CHIEF JOHN DOE, et al., (Docs. 13, 14) Defendants. TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

14 Plaintiff Harold Walker, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a civil rights complaint against the City of Fresno, eight officers of the Fresno Police Department and three employees of Grocery Outlet on October 31, 2019. (Doc. 1.) In his original Complaint, attempted to plead claims for “making false statement[s] to police,” false arrest, “false prosecution,” excessive force, and municipal liability in violation of his Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and rights under the California Constitution. (Id. at 5–7.) On December 12, 2019, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.