Martin
Martin v. Pfzifer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LANCE R. MARTIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00605-NONE-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING
v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED
WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES; AND
C. PFZIFER, et al., DISMISSING ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS
Defendants. (Doc. No. 5)
16 Lance R. Martin (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 4, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations recommending that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend as frivolous and that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees be denied. (Doc. No. 5.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file formal objections. 25 …