Martin

Martin v. Pfzifer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20201:20-cv-00605California668 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANCE R. MARTIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00605-NONE-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED

WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FEES; AND

C. PFZIFER, et al., DISMISSING ACTION AS FRIVOLOUS

Defendants. (Doc. No. 5)

16 Lance R. Martin (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 4, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge filed a findings and recommendations recommending that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend as frivolous and that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis without prepayment of fees be denied. (Doc. No. 5.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff did not file formal objections. 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.