Docanto

(PC) Casey v. Docanto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 18, 20201:20-cv-00420California769 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00420-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION

M. DOCANTO, et al., ) ) (Doc. No. 14) Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff James Arthur Casey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 5, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that the instant action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. No. 14.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that objections thereto were due within twenty-one (21) days. (Id.) The time for filing objections has passed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.