Quinonez

Quinonez v. FCA US LLC

Bad Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 19, 20202:19-cv-02032California2,348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY QUINONEZ, No. 2:19-cv-2032-KJM Plaintiff, v. ORDER FCA US LLC, Defendants. 16 In this case brought under California’s Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“Song-Beverly Act”), plaintiff moves to remand on the basis that the amount in controversy does not meet the jurisdictional minimum for diversity jurisdiction in federal court. For the reasons below, the court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND On or around January 15, 2018, plaintiff Mary Quinonez (“plaintiff”) purchased the vehicle at issue from defendants; the vehicle was a 2017 Jeep that qualified as a new vehicle under the Song-Beverly Act. Notice of Removal Ex. A, ECF No. 1-1 at 16 (plaintiff’s state court complaint). At the time of purchase, plaintiff claims she received express and implied warranties under the Song-Beverly Act from defendants, including representations that: the vehicle would be free from all defects; the vehicle…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.