(PS) El Bey v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 19, 20202:19-cv-02467California2,054 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAH RA EL BEY, No. 2:19-cv-2467 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Jah Ra El Bey is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was, therefore, referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the undersigned is defendants Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, commenced this action on February 5, 2019, by filing a complaint in the Sacramento County Superior Court. (ECF No. 1-1 at 1.1) Defendants HUD and //// 27 1 Page number citations such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.