CDCR

(HC) Harper v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 19, 20202:20-cv-01119California720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HARPER, No. 2:20-cv-01119 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CDCR, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding in pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner is currently confined in California Medical Facility. In his habeas petition, for the nature of offense petitioner seeks to contest, petitioner states, “to get the inmates to get punished for the sexual crimes these inmates do to the female staff at the prisons in California and not get punished for it.” ECF No. 1 at 1. The petition also includes federal regulations, secondary 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.