Levy
Levy v. City of Sacramento
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 19, 20202:18-cv-02387California645 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
S USANA ALCALA WOOD, City Attorney (SBN 156366) KATHLEEN T. ROGAN, Senior Deputy City Attorney (SBN 186055) KRogan@cityofsacramento.org
CITY OF SACRAMENTO
915 I Street, Room 4010 Sacramento, CA 95814-2608 Telephone: (916) 808-5346 Facsimile: (916) 808-7455 5 Attorneys for the CITY OF SACRAMENTO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BYRON H. LEVY, Case No.: 2:18-cv-02387-TLN-DB
Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO TAKE
PLAINTIFF’S DEPOSITION, vs. DISCLOSE EXPERTS, and FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS
CITY OF SACRAMENTO,
Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 16, a party may seek to modify a scheduling order, including 18 modification of a discovery cut-off date “for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” (Fed. 19 R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).) “good cause” exists when a scheduling deadline “cannot reasonably be 20 met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.” (Schaffner v. Crown Equipment 21 Corporation,…