White

White v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20201:20-cv-00090California2,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RHASAUN WHITE, Case No. 1:20-cv-00090-NONE-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant. (Doc. No. 12) 16

18 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Rhasaun White’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for leave to file a First Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2). (Doc. No. 12.) Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (“Defendant”) filed an opposition on June 12, 2020. (Doc. No. 14.) Plaintiff filed a reply on June 19, 2020. (Doc. No. 15.) The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and HEREBY VACATES the hearing set for June 26, 2020. Local Rule 230(g). The matter is deemed submitted. Having considered the parties’ briefs and arguments, as well as the record in this case, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.