Jimenez

(PC) Jones v. Jimenez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:14-cv-02045California1,262 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEREMY JONES, No. 1:14-cv-02045-DAD-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

J. LUNDY, et al., (Doc. No. 149) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Jeremy Jones is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 14, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. (Doc. No. 128.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections thereto were to be filed within twenty-one days. (Id. at 16.) Plaintiff filed requests for extensions of time (Doc. Nos. 131, 133), with the magistrate judge granting plaintiff’s requests in part and requiring him to file any objections to the findings and recommendations by April 30, 2019. (Doc. No. 136.) Nonetheless, plaintiff did not file objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.