Parker

(PC) Bettencourt v. Parker

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20201:16-cv-00150California590 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GARY RAY BETTENCOURT, Case No. 1:16-cv-00150-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

CONCERNING A SETTLEMENT AND

v. GARNISHMENT OF WAGES (ECF No. 40) PARKER, et al.,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S DEMAND

Defendants. FOR TRIAL AND/OR SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

(ECF No. 43) 15 Plaintiff Gary Ray Bettencourt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint has been screened, and findings and recommendations allowing the cognizable claims to proceed are pending before the District Judge. On November 12, 2019, Plaintiff filed a “Motion Concerning a Settlement and Garnishments of wages By Government Codes And or Settlement Conferences; or Trial; Motion for Summary Judgement against the Three Defendants to Award money damages.” (ECF No. 40.) On April 24, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.