Hicks

(PC) Washington v. Hicks

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:19-cv-00156California538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL vs. (Doc. No. 18.) 13 DAVID HICKS, et al., ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO PROCEED

ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS HICKS

Defendants. AND ROCHA FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE

FORCE IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH

AMENDMENT, AND DISMISSING ALL

OTHER DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS FOR

PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A

CLAIM

18 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 20, 2020, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed only against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.