Hicks
(PC) Washington v. Hicks
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:19-cv-00156California538 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 1:19-cv-00156-NONE-GSA-PC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN FULL vs. (Doc. No. 18.) 13 DAVID HICKS, et al., ORDER FOR THIS CASE TO PROCEED
ONLY AGAINST DEFENDANTS HICKS
Defendants. AND ROCHA FOR USE OF EXCESSIVE
FORCE IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH
AMENDMENT, AND DISMISSING ALL
OTHER DEFENDANTS AND CLAIMS FOR
PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
18 Plaintiff Tracye Benard Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 20, 2020, the court entered findings and recommendations, recommending that this action proceed only against defendants Sergeant David Hicks and Correctional Officer Hipolito Rocha…