Dick

Phillip Bonnette v. Dick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:18-cv-00046California7,485 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP BONNETTE, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-0046-DAD-BAM Plaintiffs,

SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

v. PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

LELAND ROSS DICK, et al.,

Defendants. (Doc. No. 15)

18 Plaintiffs Phillip Bonnette and Linda Faye Grant-Jones (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action against Defendants Leland Ross Dick, Michael Herbert Crowley, Ronald James Works, the Fresno County Sheriff Margaret Mims, Kevin Lolkus, Daniel Epperly, Sean Quinn, Sergeant Hansen, and John Epickson. On April 5, 2019, the Court screened Plaintiffs’ complaint and granted leave to amend. (Doc. No. 14.) Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. No. 15.) I. Screening Requirement and Standard The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiffs’ complaint, or any portion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.