(PC) Hernandez v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 23, 20202:20-cv-00817California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO HERNANDEZ, No. 2:20-cv-0817 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, Defendant. 16 By order filed April 30, 2020, plaintiff was advised that he must file a complaint in order to commence an action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 3. Plaintiff was granted thirty days to file a complaint, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this matter be dismissed. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed a complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.