Zulfa

(HC) Hairston v. Zulfa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:18-cv-01194California523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBEY HAIRSTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01194-LJO-SAB-HC

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT Petitioner, TO SEND PETITIONER BLANK PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT v. FORM 14 DAVID R. ZULFA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner who proceeded pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On September 6, 2018, the Court ordered Petitioner show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust state court remedies. (ECF No. 6). This order was served on Petitioner and contained notice that a response should be filed within thirty days of the date of service of the order. Petitioner failed to file a response to the order to show cause. Thereafter, on November 7, 2018, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendation that recommended dismissing the petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state judicial remedies. (ECF No. 9). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.