Gomez

(PC) McElroy v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:20-cv-00658California1,656 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATWAHN MCELROY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

GOMEZ, et al., ) ORDER BE DENIED ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 15] ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Latwahn McElroy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for a temporary restraining order, filed on June 18, 2020. I. LEGAL STANDARDS Procedurally, a federal district court may issue emergency injunctive relief only if it has personal jurisdiction over the parties and subject matter jurisdiction over the lawsuit. See Murphy Bros., Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc., 526 U.S. 344, 350 (1999) (noting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.