Gonzalez

Gonzalez v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJune 22, 20201:18-cv-01558California4,240 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VERONICA ORDAZ GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 1:18-cv-01558-BAM

Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO CERTIFY THE COURT’S

v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., (Doc. No. 53) Defendants.

Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Veronica Ordaz Gonzalez, Jose Ramos Santiago, Omar Perez, and Roberto Perez’ (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Certify the Court’s Order Denying Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend Complaint. (Doc. No. 53.)1 On June 12, 2020, Defendant County of Fresno (“Defendant”) filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. No. 55.) Plaintiffs replied on June 19, 2020. (Doc. No. 58.) The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g) and VACATES the hearing set for June 26, 2020. Having considered the motion, the opposition, and the reply, as well as the entire record in this case, Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.